Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 is just a bit better than Moto X4, having a global score of 75.8 against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A6 is a just a little thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Moto X4, even though they were released only 7 months apart. The Motorola Moto X4 features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A6. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a greater display pixel density. Motorola Moto X4 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video and a way lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Motorola Moto X4 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto X4 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A6 features a battery performance that's just as good as the Moto X4 one.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A6 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.