Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X4, having a 75.8 score against 74.4. The Galaxy A7 (2017) is a heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto X4, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. Motorola Moto X4 has a bit better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Motorola Moto X4 also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto X4 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto X4 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto X4 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A7 (2017). Both have 3 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has improved battery life than Moto X4, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.