Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Moto X4's general score of 74.4. The Galaxy A70 is a heavier phone than Moto X4, but both are equally thin. Motorola Moto X4 and Galaxy A70 count with really similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A70 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Moto X4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The Motorola Moto X4 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto X4 also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A70 has a much better battery performance than Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A70 costs a bit more money than the Motorola Moto X4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.