Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is much better than Motorola Moto X4, getting an 87.5 score against 74.4. The Galaxy A71 construction is way newer and just a little thinner, but just a little heavier than the Motorola Moto X4. The Moto X4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A71 has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A71 captures way better pictures and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 MP resolution, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a superior battery life than Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 is way more expensive than the Moto X4, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.