Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is better than Moto X4, with a score of 84.6 against 74.4. Galaxy F23's construction is noticeably newer and a lot lighter, but a little bit thicker than the Moto X4. Motorola Moto X4 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
The Moto X4 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F23, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto X4 and Galaxy F23 both count with quite similar processors, and although the Galaxy F23 has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto X4 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography and video. The Galaxy F23 has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.