Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto X4's 74.4 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy F62 is incredibly newer than Motorola Moto X4, it's thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit sharper screen than Moto X4, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy F62 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better CPU than Moto X4, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Moto X4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy F62 has a very superior camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.