Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than the Moto X4's global score of 74.4. Galaxy M51 is a incredibly newer phone than the Moto X4, but it's thicker and a lot heavier. Moto X4 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy M51 has a greater camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also has a back camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
The Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery performance than Moto X4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.