Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than Moto X4, with a global score of 90.8 against 74.4. Even though Galaxy Note 20 is extremely newer than the Moto X4, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto X4 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of screen. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Moto X4 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto X4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto X4, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.