Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto X4's 74.4 global score. Although it's the best device in this review, we must highlight that it's also a noticeably older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier device. The Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processing unit than Moto X4, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels amount per inch in the screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Moto X4 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little better battery duration than Moto X4, because it has a 7% more battery size. The Moto X4 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images in low-light situations and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto X4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.