Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X4's 74.4 general score. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola Moto X4, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto X4, because it has a bit higher pixels density, a little bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Moto X4 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and a tinier aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same resolution camera and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto X4 features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto X4, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto X4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save some money and get the Moto X4, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.