Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is better than the Motorola Moto X4, getting an 89 score against 74.4. Galaxy Note10 is a just a bit heavier phone than the Motorola Moto X4, but both have the same thickness. Moto X4 has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Moto X4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better CPU than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 megapixels camera in the back, the Galaxy Note10 also has a lot larger aperture to take better low-light captures and better video frame rates.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto X4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X4, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.