Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X4, getting a global score of 77.6 against 74.4. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy Note4's body is older, a little thicker and just a little heavier than the Motorola Moto X4. The Moto X4 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note4. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy Note4 features a bit more vivid screen than Moto X4, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution, a bit larger screen and a quite greater pixel amount in each screen inch. The Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto X4, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Moto X4 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto X4 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a little better battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.