Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-01-09 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy On7 Prime is just a bit better than the Moto X4, having a 76.9 score against 74.4. Galaxy On7 Prime's body has the same thickness than Moto X4, but it's just a little bit heavier. The Motorola Moto X4 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Moto X4 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Motorola Moto X4 also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Moto X4 features a better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto X4 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a worse resolution back camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures. Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.