Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is way better than the Moto X4, getting a overall score of 94.8 against 74.4. The Galaxy S20 is a a little bit heavier phone than the Moto X4, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 captures better photographs and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low light environments, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than Moto X4, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.