Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is way better than Motorola Moto X4's general score of 74.4. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a notably newer cellphone than Motorola Moto X4, although it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
The Moto X4 and the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit lower number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S20 FE also has faster video frame rate, a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than Moto X4, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.