Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto X4's general score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is a lot newer than Motorola Moto X4's, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Moto X4, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3200px resolution, a bit greater pixels density and a way larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater photos and videos than Moto X4, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a way better video definition and a bigger aperture. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto X4, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.