Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than Moto X4's 74.4 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer phone than Moto X4, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a bit better screen pixel density, a really bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Moto X4 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto X4. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Moto X4, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.