Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 FE is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X4, with a 76 score against 74.4. Galaxy S24 FE is a incredibly heavier phone than Motorola Moto X4, but they have the same thickness. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Motorola Moto X4 has a really superior processing power than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores. The Moto X4 shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels.
Moto X4 counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto X4, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto X4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto X4, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.