Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than Moto X4, getting an 82.6 score against 74.4. Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and thinner phone than the Moto X4. The Moto X4 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S25 features a better looking display than Moto X4, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Moto X4, because it has a way better video definition, a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations and a lot larger sensor. Moto X4 has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S25 features superior battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto X4. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto X4, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.