Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.75 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Moto X4's overall score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is notably lighter and extremely thinner than Moto X4. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a much bigger display, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto X4, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Moto X4 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a much higher video definition, a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.