Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Moto X4's 74.4 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a older and somewhat thicker phone than Moto X4, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better processing unit than Moto X4, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a better looking display than Moto X4, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a just a little better pixels amount in each inch in the display. Galaxy S5 Sport's camera is just as good as Moto X4's camera, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality and a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, it also counts with a much more MP camera.
Moto X4 has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 16 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto X4 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Galaxy S5 Sport is a little more expensive than Motorola Moto X4, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.