Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Moto X4's 74.4 global score. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is extremely newer than Moto X4, it is way thicker and noticeably heavier. Moto X4 has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto X4 has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Motorola Moto X4, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing much lower quality images, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a very superior battery duration than Moto X4, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro costs a lot more than Moto X4, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.