Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Motorola Moto X4, having an 88.5 score against 74.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto X4, it's a bit thinner and a lot newer. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better hardware performance than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto X4. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto X4, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.