Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Motorola Moto X4, having a 94.6 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is newer and thinner, but also notably heavier than Motorola Moto X4. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processing power than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto X4 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a lot lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way better battery lifetime than Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a way bigger camera sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto X4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto X4, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.