Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is a lot better than the Moto X4's overall score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto X4's, although it is also notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better performance than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto X4 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display. The Motorola Moto X4 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels, the Motorola Moto X4 also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better battery duration than Moto X4, because it has a 47% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.