Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a score of 76.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X4's general score of 74.4. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 design is way newer than the Motorola Moto X4's, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola Moto X4 has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of them have the same number of cores and 3 GB of RAM memory.
Moto X4 features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
The Moto X4 has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 costs a little more than Moto X4, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.