Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, getting a general score of 82 against 75.6. The iPhone XR design is extremely newer, but much thicker and noticeably heavier than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition. The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a little bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel quantity per inch of screen and a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. IPhone XR has a quite better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and 2 more processing cores.
Apple iPhone XR has a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 2942mAh of battery capacity. IPhone XR takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lesser mega pixels camera in the back, they both have a same size aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.