Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than the Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 score. These devices include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is much newer, but notably thicker and heavier than Moto Z Droid Edition.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has more cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count in each inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a worse video resolution and a back camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos. The Moto Z Droid Edition has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a superior battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.