Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 general score. The LG V35 ThinQ body is newer than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's, although it is heavier and thicker. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a quite better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ and Moto Z Droid Edition have incredibly similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a camera with more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The LG V35 ThinQ has better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.