Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto Z Droid Edition's global score of 75.6. LG Velvet's construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z Droid Edition's, but it is noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier. The Moto Z Droid Edition has a slightly better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel count per inch in the screen.
The LG Velvet counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal storage capacity. The LG Velvet has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
LG Velvet features a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh. The LG Velvet has a better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the LG Velvet also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.