Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, with a score of 75.8 against 75.6. Even though nubia Red Magic 3S is newer than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, it's much thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version, so it counts with some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Moto Z Droid Edition has a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixel density. The Moto Z Droid Edition has a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster processor than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S captures way better photos and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.