Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the Moto Z Droid Edition, getting a global score of 79.9 against 75.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a lot newer than the Moto Z Droid Edition, it is incredibly heavier and way thicker. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 4 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better looking display than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a much worse number of pixels in each inch of screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 92 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A25 5G captures better photos and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a much more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.