Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's overall score of 75.6. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version. Galaxy A31's body is much newer than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's, although it's heavier and noticeably thicker.
Galaxy A31 features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A31 also has 4 more cores (although slower). Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better amount of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A31 counts with a much better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A31 features a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.