Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a global score of 82, which is a bit better than the Moto Z Droid Edition's global score of 75.6. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the older 11 version and Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version. Even though the Galaxy A32 LTE Only is thicker than Moto Z Droid Edition, it's incredibly lighter and also a lot newer.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a slightly better screen than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Moto Z Droid Edition has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a higher number of cores (although slower). The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.