Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 is a bit better than Moto Z Droid Edition, getting an 81.7 score against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy A41 is a extremely newer phone than the Moto Z Droid Edition, but it's a lot thicker and heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit greater pixel density. Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A41, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A41 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has 4 more processing cores. The Galaxy A41 captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Galaxy A41 counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.