Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the Moto Z Droid Edition, getting an 86.6 score against 75.6. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy A50s's construction is incredibly newer, but notably thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z Droid Edition.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has a little sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM.
The Moto Z Droid Edition has a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a superior battery duration than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A50s captures a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.