Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's general score of 75.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version. The Galaxy A51 is a way newer phone than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, but it's thicker and way heavier.
Moto Z Droid Edition features a little sharper display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A51 captures way better photographs and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A51 has a way better battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.