Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is extremely newer, but much thicker and notably heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z Droid Edition counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 73% bigger battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.