Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is way better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much newer than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, it's way thicker and extremely heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.