Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Moto Z Droid Edition, getting a 92.9 score against 75.6. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a lot newer cellphone than the Moto Z Droid Edition, but it is much heavier and way thicker.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Moto Z Droid Edition counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much longer battery life than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 73% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.