Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is much better than Moto Z Droid Edition, getting an 85.2 score against 75.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy F41 is much newer than the Moto Z Droid Edition, it is way heavier and notably thicker. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has older 11 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy F41 captures way better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a much better resolution back camera.
Galaxy F41 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 131% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.