Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Moto Z Droid Edition, with a overall score of 97.6 against 75.6. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version, so it offers some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer device than Moto Z Droid Edition, but it is notably thicker and notably heavier.
The Galaxy Fold features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Galaxy Fold features a much better battery performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.