Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, with a overall score of 78.9 against 75.6. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M20 has older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M20 is extremely newer than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, it's notably thicker and much heavier.
The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has 4 less cpu cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Moto Z Droid Edition features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a 13 mega-pixels back camera, the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M20 has a way better battery duration than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.