Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, getting a general score of 90.8 against 75.6. Galaxy Note 20's body is way newer than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's, but it is noticeably heavier and thicker. Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixel density.
Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a way better battery duration than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh. Galaxy Note 20 features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.