Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's score of 75.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, but it's way heavier and a lot thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper display than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better battery performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.