Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-07-28 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition's overall score of 75.6. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, we must note that it is also way older, heavier and extremely thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little faster CPU than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and way lesser pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Droid Edition, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back camera.
Moto Z Droid Edition counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.