Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and much thicker than Moto Z Droid Edition. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a display that's very similar to the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a quite worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 4 more processing cores. Moto Z Droid Edition features a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z Droid Edition also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with longer battery performance than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 23 percent greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's camera is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a worse (4K) video quality and a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.