Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-28 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than Moto Z Droid Edition, having a 93.6 score against 75.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way newer than Moto Z Droid Edition, it is thicker and notably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a 73% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a worse video resolution and a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.