Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-07-28 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Moto Z Droid Edition's 75.6 overall score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version while Moto Z Droid Edition has Android 7.1 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and way lighter phone than the Moto Z Droid Edition.
Moto Z Droid Edition counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a better looking screen than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has a much better video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a lot higher 200 MP resolution camera. Moto Z Droid Edition has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.