Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-28 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Droid Edition's score of 75.6. Despite being the best device we compare here, Galaxy S7 Active's construction is notably heavier and much thicker than Moto Z Droid Edition. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z Droid Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a little better pixels number in each inch in the screen.
The Moto Z Droid Edition has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 4 cores. The Moto Z Droid Edition shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z Droid Edition also counts with a camera in the back with a better 13 megapixels resolution.
The Moto Z Droid Edition features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S7 Active features a superior battery duration than Moto Z Droid Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.